What matters is having a consistent, repeatable frame rate so that the visual studdering doesn't distract you from your suspension of disbelief in the game.
Having more frames per second than your monitor allows will just create a random tearing on the screen that moves at the beat frequency of your monitors refresh rate and the rate you are getting from the game.
If the game cannot consistently get the 60 or 75 Hz that frame rate that is optimal for your monitor, than it would be better to aim for half the frame rate, or even a third. So that the animation is smooth and not studdering at a random rate.
We watched interlaced video at 15 full frames a second at a resolution of about 320x200 on regular TV for decades without any problems. Your video game will look awesome non interlaced on your computer monitor at a consistent 30 or 60 frames a second.
A little bit of motion burr will cover up any jerkiness and let the frames blend together, just like the motion blur you have in your own eyes when things are moving quickly.
A blog devoted to challenging dogma, where ever and who ever is shoveling it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Digital Town Hall: Architectural Constraints as Democratic Defense
J. Rogers, SE Ohio. A Sociological Analysis of the Distributed Dunbar Protocol 1. Abstract The transition from analog democratic feedback l...
-
The tent smelled of ozone, sawdust, and cheap miracles. On a rickety stage, a man named Constantine adjusted the frayed cuffs of his tuxedo...
-
First the bad news. For som e reason the Amazon Web S ervice console was running very badly under F irefox. It was taking forever to load a...
-
So, I saw this kit on Amazon. It seemed too good too be true. The kit was priced right, it was less than 2 dollars for each board. Of co...
No comments:
Post a Comment