The Arrow and the River: A Time-Centric Explanation of Inertial Motion

J. Rogers, SE Ohio

Abstract
For four centuries, the inertial motion of an object, such as a flying arrow, has been described by Newton's First Law but never truly explained. The law's assertion that an object in motion stays in motion is a foundational axiom, not a physical mechanism. This paper provides that missing mechanism by applying a time-centric framework of physics. We posit that reality is a dynamic time field, and an object's state is defined by its "time experience" within that field. Within this framework, we redefine foundational concepts: Gravity is the geometry of the time field; Motion is the natural experience of following a geodesic through that field; and Inertia is the resistance to having one's time experience changed by a non-gravitational force. We demonstrate that the flight of an arrow is not a state of "moving," but a state of temporal desynchronization relative to its environment, initiated by the force of the bowstring. The arrow's continued flight is its inertial resistance to re-synchronization. Its eventual stop upon impact is the process of a violent, forced re-synchronization with the target, where the arrow's kinetic energy is revealed to be the energy cost of its temporal desynchronization. This model replaces a 400-year-old axiom with a dynamic, mechanistic explanation for the universe's most fundamental behaviors.

---

1. The 400-Year-Old Question

Since Isaac Newton, the question of why a projectile continues to fly after it has left the launcher has been answered with a tautology. We ask, "Why does the arrow keep moving?" and the axiom of inertia replies, "Because an object in motion stays in motion." We have given a name to the phenomenon—inertia—but we have not provided a mechanism for it. The classical framework describes what happens with impeccable accuracy but remains silent on why.

This silence represents one of the deepest gaps in our physical understanding. The explanation of inertia and motion has been deferred by declaring them "axiomatic" or "intrinsic properties of mass." This paper contends that these concepts are not axiomatic at all, but are emergent consequences of a deeper, time-centric reality. We will show that the flight of an arrow is not a mystery to be accepted, but a logical process to be understood.

2. The Axioms of a Time-Centric Framework

To explain the arrow, we must first abandon the classical view of a passive, uniform time against which objects move. We replace it with a dynamic, structured time field as the primary reality. The following three axioms define this framework:

• Axiom I: Gravity is a time field. The universe is a geometric landscape where the rate of time varies with position, primarily determined by the distribution of mass-energy (τ = Σ M_nat/R_nat). This field defines the "currents" and "contours" of spacetime.

• Axiom II: Motion is the experience of time in that time field. In the absence of non-gravitational forces, an object follows its natural path—a geodesic—through the time field. What we perceive as "motion" is the observable consequence of an object's evolving time experience as it navigates this landscape.

• Axiom III: Inertia is the resistance to changing your experience of time in a time field. A non-gravitational force is an action that attempts to push an object off its natural geodesic, thereby changing its time experience (its Lorentz factor, γ, relative to a frame). Inertia is the cosmically-defined resistance to this forced change.

3. The Life of an Arrow: A Four-Act Play of Temporal Experience

Using these axioms, we can now provide a complete, mechanistic explanation for the arrow's entire journey.

Act 1: The Arrow at Rest — A State of Forced Synchronization

Before it is fired, the arrow is nocked on the bow. In the classical view, it is in a natural state of "rest." In our framework, it is in a profoundly unnatural state. The archer's arm is applying a constant upward force to counteract the arrow's natural geodesic, which is to follow the time field gradient toward the center of the Earth. This force holds the arrow in a state of perfect temporal synchronization with the Earth's surface. Its time experience is locked to the ground's.

Act 2: The Action — A Violent Desynchronization

The archer releases the bowstring. The string applies a massive, non-gravitational force to the arrow. According to Axiom III, this force is not merely "adding velocity"; it is performing the specific physical action of changing the arrow's time experience. It violently pushes the arrow off its synchronized, Earth-bound path and places it onto a new, free geodesic. This act imparts a new Lorentz factor γ relative to the ground. The arrow is now temporally desynchronized from the world it just left.

Act 3: The Flight — Maintaining Desynchronization

The moment the arrow leaves the bowstring, all external forces (ignoring air resistance) are gone. Its accelerometer reads zero. It is in perfect free fall, following its new, natural geodesic through the Earth's time field.

Why does it keep flying forward? It is not because of a mysterious internal property called "inertia." It is because, according to Axiom III, inertia is the resistance to changing its current time experience. Having been forcibly desynchronized from the Earth, the arrow will now naturally maintain that state of desynchronization. It does not need a force to keep it going; it now requires a force to alter this new, coasting state. The arrow's flight is a period of sustained temporal desynchronization.

Act 4: The Impact — A Forced Re-Synchronization

The arrow strikes a target. The target, being fixed to the Earth, has a time experience synchronized with the ground. The impact is a violent interaction between two objects with different temporal experiences.

The target's electromagnetic structure imposes an enormous force on the arrow, resisting its path. This force, according to Axiom III, acts to change the arrow's time experience again. The arrow's inertia resists this change, but the target (being connected to the Earth) is far more inertially dominant. The result is a forced re-synchronization. The arrow's time rate is violently brought back into sync with the target's.

4. Redefining Our Foundational Concepts

This narrative of the arrow forces a radical redefinition of the core concepts of mechanics.

Concept	The Classical Description	The Time-Centric Explanation
Motion	A primary axiom: change of position over time.	An emergent symptom of an object following its natural geodesic through the time field.
Inertia	An intrinsic property of mass that resists changes in motion.	A cosmic coupling that resists the forced change of an object's established time experience.
Force	The cause of changes in motion (F=ma).	The agent of temporal desynchronization; the act of pushing an object off its natural path.
Rest	The natural, force-free state of an object.	A forced, unnatural state requiring a constant force to prevent an object from following its natural motion.
Kinetic Energy	A quantity an object "has" due to its motion (KE=½mv²).	The measurable energy cost of temporal desynchronization (KE=(γ-1)m₀c²).

The energy we call "kinetic" is the energy required to create the arrow's desynchronized state, and it is the same energy that is released as heat, sound, and deformation during the violent process of re-synchronization upon impact.

5. Conclusion: From Axiom to Mechanism

The classical explanation for why an arrow flies is an axiom: "because it does." This is an abdication of the scientific duty to seek a mechanism. The time-centric framework provides the first true, mechanistic explanation for this fundamental phenomenon.

An arrow does not keep flying because it "wants" to stay in motion. It keeps flying because it has been placed in a state of temporal desynchronization, and its inertia is the universe's resistance to changing that state. It stops when the world violently re-imposes its own time synchronization upon it.

We have mistaken the map for the territory. Motion is not a line on a static map of space. It is the experience of navigating the dynamic, flowing river of time. The arrow keeps flying for the same reason a log keeps floating downstream: it is following the natural current of the universe.