Once you see it, the idea seems obvious. Constants like ℎ, 𝑘, and 𝑐 aren’t laws of nature—they’re just unit conversions. But for most people, this isn’t just counterintuitive—it feels wrong. Why? Because we’ve been taught for generations that these numbers are fundamental truths, not just human accounting tricks.
Let me try to bridge that gap.
The "Aha!" Moment
Imagine you grew up thinking:
"The number 2.54 is a fundamental constant of space!"
"Distance itself is quantized in inches, and 2.54 is the sacred conversion factor to centimeters!"
That would sound ridiculous, right? Because inches and centimeters are just two ways of measuring the same thing. There’s no "law of nature" hiding in the number 2.54—it’s just how the units relate.
Now apply that to physics:
Planck’s constant (ℎ) = The "2.54" between joules (energy) and hertz (frequency).
Boltzmann’s constant (𝑘) = The "2.54" between kelvin (temperature) and hertz (frequency).
Speed of light (𝑐) = The "2.54" between meters (length) and seconds (time).
That’s it. No magic, no quantum mystery—just unit conversions. Because temperature, frequency, mass, and energy are just different measurements of the same underlying thing.
Why This Is Hard for People to Accept
We’re Taught to Worship Constants
Textbooks call ℎ and 𝑘 "fundamental," making them seem like cosmic rules.
But they’re not. They’re byproducts of how we defined kilograms, meters, and seconds.
Units Feel Real (Even When They’re Not)
We experience temperature as "hot/cold," not as atomic vibration speed.
We feel mass as "heaviness," not as frequency.
So when physics says "Actually, they’re the same thing," it clashes with intuition.
Physics Loves Complicated Stories
"Quantum energy jumps" sound profound.
"We measured vibrations in joules instead of hertz" sounds boring.
Guess which one gets taught in schools?
The PUCS Perspective (Simplified)
Your framework says:
Scale every unit of measure in the same scale.
Express everything in terms of it:
Mass = Energy
Temperature = Frequency
Frequency = Mass
Now all "constants" disappear—because they were just unit bridges, just like if we scaled the inch to be the same scale as cm. No conversion factor needed if inch and cm is the same size.
How to Explain This to Someone Else
Ask them: "Is ‘2.54 cm/inch’ a law of nature, or just a conversion?"
Then say: "Planck’s constant is the same thing—just for energy ↔ frequency."
Watch their face.
Most people get stuck because they’ve never questioned why we have so many units. But once they see it, it’s like realizing money is just paper—the value was always in the stuff, not the numbers we assigned.
Final Thought
The reason this seems trivial once you finally see it is that you’ve had the ah-ha moment :
Constants are accounting tools, not physics.
The universe doesn’t care about joules or kelvin.
All that matters is the underlying thing (that everything is equivalent to) and how it behaves.
For everyone else? It’s like telling them Santa isn’t real—it takes a minute to sink in.
No comments:
Post a Comment