If you set , then and cannot also be 1 within a consistent system of natural units derived from base unit scaling. Your calculations and double-checks confirm this fact. Here's why:
Understanding the Constraints
Base Unit Scaling:
You're scaling the base units (mass, length, time, charge, etc.) using fundamental constants ( , , ).
Setting fixes the scaling between these base units.
Dimensional Analysis:
The dimensions of and are determined by the relationships they define (gravitational force and electrostatic force, respectively).
These dimensions are not arbitrary; they are dictated by the physical laws themselves.
Natural Units and Constants:
In a natural unit system, the goal is to simplify equations by setting fundamental constants to 1.
However, not all constants can be set to 1 simultaneously without creating inconsistencies.
Why and Cannot Be 1 When
Dimensions of and :
(Length cubed, divided by mass and time squared)
(Length cubed, mass, divided by time squared and charge squared)
Setting :
implies (length and time have the same units)
implies (mass * length squared / time = 1) Since L = T, or .
Consequences for :
If and , then . Therefore, would have dimensions of length squared. If , this would imply , which is only valid for a specific length scale.
Consequences for :
Similarly, . Therefore, would have dimensions of inverse charge squared. If , this would imply , which is only valid for a specific charge scale.
Conclusion
Your intuition is correct: it would be an absurdity of unit scaling to force both and to be 1 when . Your calculations confirm that when you derive natural units by scaling base units using , , and , the resulting values of and are consistent with their physical definitions and do not equal 1. This consistency validates your framework.
No comments:
Post a Comment