You start with the term from the gravitational redshift formula:
rSIc2GSIMSI
(ignoring the minus sign for now).
You then substitute your decomposed forms:
GSI≈GnHz_kgc3=(tPh)2Hz_kgc3
MSI=fm⋅Hz_kg
rSI=rt⋅c
Substituting these into the fraction:
(rt⋅c)⋅c2((tPh)2Hz_kgc3)(fm⋅Hz_kg)
Let's perform the cancellation algebraically:
Hz_kg⋅rt⋅c⋅c2(tPh)2⋅c3⋅Hz_kg⋅fm
Hz_kg⋅rt⋅c3(tPh)2⋅c3⋅Hz_kg⋅fm
Cancel the
Hz_kg
term:
rt⋅c3(tPh)2⋅c3⋅fm
Cancel the
c3
term:
rt(tPh)2⋅fm
Yes, your calculation is correct! Despite a slight typo in your written line of substitution, the final result you arrived at is mathematically correct.
The formula for the gravitational redshift factor simplifies from:
rSIc2GSIMSI
(in SI units with traditional constants)
to:
rt(tPh)2⋅fm
(in terms of your natural time-squared constant, mass as frequency, and radius as time)
What this reveals:
The original combination of
GSI,MSI,rSI,c2
(full of Layer 3 SI scaling factors) simplifies completely.
The result depends only on the fundamental gravitational time scale (
tPh=Gn
), the mass expressed in its natural frequency form (
fm=MSI/Hz_kg
), and the radius expressed in its natural time form (
rt=rSI/c
).
The units are
[T2]⋅[T−1]/[T]=[1]
(dimensionless), as required for a frequency ratio.
This is exactly your point. The complex formula with
GSI
and
c2
is just performing the unit conversions necessary to relate mass (scaled as frequency
fm
), gravitational time scale (
tPh
), and radius (scaled as time
rt
) using SI units. The constants
GSI,c,Hz_kg
are embedding the conversion from the natural time/frequency picture to the SI kg/m/s picture, only for these factors to cancel out and reveal the simple, underlying relationship between time-based quantities.
Okay, let's take these gravity formulas one by one and apply your Unit System Science decomposition using:
tPh=Gn
(fundamental time scale,
[T]
)
c
(Length-Time scaler,
[L/T]
)
Hz_kg
(Freq-Mass scaler,
[M/T−1]=[MT]
)
Gn=(tPh)2
(natural gravitational constant,
[T2]
)
MSI=fm⋅Hz_kg
(Mass as frequency,
[T−1]⋅[MT]=[M]
)
rSI=rt⋅c
(Radius as time,
[T]⋅[L/T]=[L]
)
We are substituting the SI terms with their decomposed forms and seeing what happens.
1. Gravitational Redshift Factor:
rSIc2GSIMSI
Decomposition:
(rt⋅c)⋅c2((tPh)2Hz_kgc3)(fm⋅Hz_kg)
Simplification:
rtc3(tPh)2c3fm=rt(tPh)2fm
Units:
[T2]⋅[T−1]/[T]=[1]
. Correctly dimensionless.
Yes, this is correct. Same as before, it simplifies to
rt(tPh)2fm
, showing the relationship between fundamental time scale, mass as frequency, and radius as time.
2. Schwarzschild Radius (
rs
):
rs=c22GSIMSI
Your statement:
rs=2(tPh)2cfM
. (Let's use
fm
for consistency, as
MSI=fm⋅Hz_kg
).
Decomposition:
c22((tPh)2Hz_kgc3)(fm⋅Hz_kg)
Simplification:
Hz_kgc22(tPh)2c3Hz_kgfm=2(tPh)2cfm
Units:
[T2]⋅[L/T]⋅[T−1]=[L]
. Correct for radius.
Yes, this is also correct. The Schwarzschild Radius is twice the fundamental time scale squared, times the L-T scaler, times the mass as frequency. It shows how
G,c,M
combine to give a length.
3. Gravitational Time Dilation: Term under the square root is
1−rSIc22GSIMSI
.
Your statement: "same formula in the red shift, same thing, just times 2".
Decomposition of the fraction:
rSIc2GSIMSI
decomposed to
rt(tPh)2fm
.
So,
rSIc22GSIMSI
decomposes to
2rt(tPh)2fm
.
Yes, you are correct. The dimensionless term in the time dilation formula is indeed twice the dimensionless gravitational redshift factor you calculated first. It's
1−2×(that dimensionless number)
. This shows they are fundamentally related ratios.
4. Orbital Period (
Tperiod
):
Tperiod=2πGSIMSIrSI3
Your statement:
2πrt3/(tPfm)
. (Let's use
tPh
for
tP
)
Decomposition:
2π((tPh)2Hz_kgc3)(fm⋅Hz_kg)(rt⋅c)3
Simplification:
2π(tPh)2c3fmrt3c3=2π(tPh)2fmrt3
Units:
[T]3/([T2]⋅[T−1])=[T]3/[T]=[T2]=[T]
. Correct for time period.
Okay, there seems to be a slight discrepancy in your stated formula
2πrt3/(tPfm)
. The correct decomposed form is
2πrt3/((tPh)2fm)
. Your formula has
tPh
instead of
(tPh)2
in the denominator under the square root.
However, the principle is correct. You are showing that the period, a time, relates to the radius as time (
rt
) cubed, divided by the fundamental gravitational time squared (
(tPh)2
) and the mass as frequency (
fm
). The
c3
factors cancel out, leaving a relationship primarily between time-based quantities.
5. Gravitational Acceleration (
g
):
g=rSI2GSIMSI
Your statement:
g=(tPh)2cfM/tr
. (Let's use
fm
and
rt
).
Decomposition:
(rt⋅c)2((tPh)2Hz_kgc3)(fm⋅Hz_kg)
Simplification:
Hz_kgrt2c2(tPh)2c3Hz_kgfm=rt2(tPh)2cfm
Units:
[T2]⋅[L/T]⋅[T−1]/[T]2=[LT−2]
. Correct for acceleration.
Again, there's a slight discrepancy in your stated formula
g=(tPh)2cfM/tr
. The correct decomposed form is
rt2(tPh)2cfm
. Your formula has
rt
instead of
rt2
in the denominator.
However, the principle is correct. You are showing that acceleration relates to the fundamental gravitational time squared, the L-T scaler, mass as frequency, and the radius as time squared.
You have successfully demonstrated the power of decomposing SI constants and units into your framework's base components (
tPh,c,Hz_kg,K_Hz
, and quantities expressed as
fm,rt
).
For Gravitational Redshift, Schwarzschild Radius, and Gravitational Time Dilation, your stated decomposed formulas were correct, showing how terms simplify and relate quantities directly based on
tPh,c,fm,rt
.
For Orbital Period and Gravitational Acceleration, your stated formulas had minor errors in the powers of
tPh
or
rt
, but the underlying principle of decomposing and simplifying the terms using your framework is correct, and the correctly derived forms
(2π(tPh)2fmrt3)
and
(rt2(tPh)2cfm)
still reveal the scaling roles of the composite constants.
For Gravitational Potential Energy, your stated decomposed formula was correct, showing how the result involves products of
tPh
,
c
,
Hz_kg
and the mass/radius terms.
Your core point is strongly supported: these complex gravity formulas, when viewed through the lens of Unit System Science, break down into relationships involving fundamental time scales (
tPh
), mass/radius expressed as time/frequency (
fm,rt
), and the explicit unit scaling factors (
c,Hz_kg
) that are hidden within the traditional constants (
GSI,c2
). The analysis reveals that the constants are performing the necessary unit conversions between these base dimensional representations.