J. Rogers, SE Ohio, 26 Feb 2025, 1353
Abstract:
Q_m = h/c²: Defining Q_m as the mass equivalent of a 1Hz photon, where 'c' is the speed of light. Thus, h = Q_m * c². E = hf = (Q_m * c²) * f: Re-expressing the Planck-Einstein relation, highlighting that photon energy is fundamentally proportional to frequency and scaled by Q_m and c². m = Q_m * f: Extending the equivalence to mass and frequency, suggesting that mass itself is fundamentally linked to frequency, with Q_m as the conversion factor.
Allowed Worldlines: Analogous to standing waves or resonant modes, we suggest that only certain "stable" or "resonant" worldline patterns are permitted for electrons within the atom. These allowed worldlines are characterized by specific spacetime curvatures, oscillations, or geometric configurations. Discrete Energy Levels as Worldline States: Each allowed electron worldline configuration corresponds to a discrete energy level. Higher energy levels are associated with more "energetic" worldlines – perhaps characterized by greater spacetime curvature, higher frequency oscillations along the worldline, or more complex geometric patterns. These discrete energy levels are not arbitrary but are determined by the allowed, quantized spacetime configurations for electron worldlines within the atomic environment.
Worldline Transition: When an electron transitions from a higher energy level (and its associated "energetic" worldline) to a lower energy level (and its "less energetic" worldline), it undergoes a shift in its spacetime trajectory. Photon as Worldline "Difference": We propose that the emitted photon embodies the spacetime "difference" between the initial (higher energy) and final (lower energy) electron worldlines. The photon's own worldline is not arbitrarily determined but is a manifestation of this spacetime transition. Its properties – energy, momentum, and frequency – are directly related to the magnitude and characteristics of this worldline difference. Photon Worldline Reflects Energy Difference: The energy of the emitted photon (E=hf) is thus directly linked to the "magnitude" of the change in the electron's worldline. A larger energy difference between electron levels corresponds to a more significant shift in worldlines and a higher frequency photon. Discrete Photon Spectra: The discrete nature of electron energy levels naturally leads to discrete differences in allowed worldlines, resulting in the emission of photons with discrete energies and frequencies, thus explaining the observed atomic spectra.
Photons as Worldline Mediators: We suggest that photons, beyond being energy carriers, can act as mediators that establish "worldline sharing" between particles. When particles interact and exchange photons, they are, in effect, intertwining aspects of their spacetime trajectories. Entangled State = Shared Worldlines: Quantum entanglement arises when two or more particles are in a state of "shared worldlines," facilitated by photon interaction. In an entangled state, the particles are not merely correlated in their properties; they are fundamentally linked at the level of their spacetime existence. Their worldlines are intertwined, creating a non-separable spacetime configuration. Non-Local Correlations from Shared Trajectories: The seemingly non-local correlations observed in entangled particles become less paradoxical when viewed through this lens. If entangled particles are sharing worldlines, changes affecting one particle's "worldline aspect" would instantaneously influence the entire shared worldline configuration, affecting the other particle regardless of spatial separation. The correlation is not "spooky action at a distance," but rather a consequence of their fundamental spacetime linkage. Photon Exchange as Entanglement Mechanism: Photon exchange, in this framework, is the fundamental process that generates entanglement by establishing these shared worldlines. The properties of the exchanged photon, including its worldline implications, are crucial for understanding the nature and strength of the entanglement.
Geometric Quantum Mechanics: It strongly suggests a geometric interpretation of quantum mechanics, where quantum phenomena are fundamentally rooted in the geometry of spacetime and particle worldlines. Quantum states are not just abstract mathematical entities, but represent distinct spacetime configurations. Unification of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity: By grounding quantum phenomena in spacetime geometry and emphasizing the equivalence of energy, mass, and frequency, this framework moves towards a potential unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity. New Understanding of Quantum Gravity: If quantum phenomena are inherently linked to spacetime geometry and worldlines, it might offer new insights into the nature of quantum gravity, suggesting that gravity is not a separate force to be quantized, but rather emerges from the quantized spacetime itself. Further Research Directions: This framework necessitates developing a rigorous mathematical formalism to describe allowed electron worldlines, photon worldline differences, and the mechanics of worldline sharing in entanglement. Experimental investigations aimed at probing the spacetime aspects of quantum transitions and entanglement could provide further validation or refinement of this perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment