J. Rogers, SE Ohio
1. Introduction
) is not an exogenous speed limit but the emergent maximum propagation rate of network updates[1].2. The Relational Network Model
, where: represent discrete causal events[1][2].Nodes (
) represent the directed causal relationships between events[1].Edges (
)
Space is emergent, defined by the relational distance (the minimum number of causal steps or edges) between nodes[7][8]. Time is emergent, defined by the sequential progression of local network updates[8][9].
cannot be defined in isolation. Its state is a history-dependent summation of its relations to all other nodes within its past light cone (the set of nodes from which there is a directed path to 3. Mass-Energy as Network Congestion
with an exceptionally high density of nodes and causal edges per unit of relational volume[5]. at a network location is minimal[5]. In regions containing significant mass-energy, 4. The Mechanism of Network Lag (Time Dilation)
introduces a processing bottleneck., must scale inversely with local network density: is a monotonically increasing function of the local congestion.In sparse regions (low
), the network updates rapidly, representing a high local clock rate ( ).In congested regions (high
), the network experiences processing lag, resulting in a slower local update rate ( ).
5. The Emergence of Gravity (The Gradient of Lags)
. Because of this gradient, one side of the object resides in a region of higher congestion (slower update rate, can be expressed as a function of the gradient of the local update rate: is inversely proportional to the local network density 6. Astrophysical Implications: Black Holes as Network Halts
The Event Horizon: As the density of the network congestion
approaches a critical threshold (the Schwarzschild limit), the local update rate relative to the outside universe approaches zero:At this boundary, the network lag becomes total. To an external observer, the "computation" of events within this region has effectively halted. The event horizon is not a point of infinite spatial curvature, but a boundary where the network's local update rate has lagged to a complete standstill relative to the external network. The Singularity: Because the network is discrete and possesses finite data capacity, physical infinities (such as infinite density or curvature) are avoided. The "singularity" is resolved as a finite, maximally congested subgraph where the network updates have ceased, representing a localized processing freeze rather than an infinite physical point.
7. Conclusion
Mass-energy is the density of local network events[5]. Time dilation is the processing lag (latency) caused by local congestion in a self-interacting system. Gravitational acceleration is the refraction of propagating subgraphs toward regions of slower update rates.
Grounding References
[1] Emergent Spacetime & Causal Graphs
Gorard, J. (2020). Some Relativistic and Gravitational Properties of the Wolfram Model. Complex Systems, 29(2), 143–218. arXiv:2004.14810[1]. Application: This paper mathematically derives the Einstein field equations from discrete, causal hypergraphs[7]. It supports Section 2, 3, and 5 by showing how "space" and "curvature" are limiting behaviors of causal networks, and how mass/energy behaves as localized topological obstructions that alter the local density of causal edges[5][7].
Huggett, N., & Wüthrich, C. (2020). Out of Nowhere: The Emergence of Spacetime in Quantum Theories of Gravity. Oxford University Press. arXiv:2009.02951[2]. Application: Grounding for Section 2. Specifically, Chapter 3 ("The emergence of spacetime from causal sets") details the philosophy and mathematical limits required for continuous, relativistic geometry to supervene on discrete, causal, non-spatial structures (causets)[11].
[2] Indeterminism and the Finiteness of Physical Data
Gisin, N. (2019). Real Numbers are the Hidden Variables of Classical Mechanics. Erkenntnis, 86, 1469-1481. arXiv:1803.06824[4]. Application: Grounding for Section 1, 4, and 7. Gisin argues that classical "determinism" is an illusion caused by a "map vs. territory" error—mistaking mathematical real numbers (which contain infinite information) for physical reality[6][12]. He proves that a finite volume of space can only hold finite information[13], establishing that the physical universe operates with finite data and progresses through real-time, non-deterministic updates[4][14].
[3] Physical Limits of Internal Observers
Wolpert, D. H. (2008). Physical Limits of Inference. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 237(9), 1257-1281. arXiv:0708.1362[3]. Application: Grounding for Section 1 and the preceding discussion on predictability. Wolpert mathematically proves that because an observer/predicting device is fundamentally a subsystem of the physical universe it is trying to calculate[15], it is restricted by self-reference[3]. It is impossible for any internal device to have complete prediction or memory of the universe's states[15][16], mathematically verifying why a self-interacting universe cannot be predicted from within.
No comments:
Post a Comment