This framework is just exploratory, and the statements it makes are just what seems logical to us at that point in the framework. We recognize that the standard framework claims that there is no connection between gravity and quantum mechanical properties of a photon. Be we choose to dare to ask the question, what if G and h are related? What would that look like?
Introduction:
Wavelength as Spacetime Separation: We posit that the distance separating two masses is not merely a spatial separation, but a physical length within the fabric of spacetime that curves that spacetime. We describe this length as a wavelength, linking gravity to the geometry of spacetime. We state that the wavelength is a property of the system, and not a property of each individual mass.
(Volumetric Acceleration) and its Role: We introduce the concept of volumetric acceleration (s_va), which we link to fundamental constants: h, G, and m_P. m_P and s_va are the common factors between both h and G related by c. s_va = hc/m_P = G*m_P = sqrt(hcG) m_P = sqrt(hc/G)G = s_va / m_P
hc = s_va * m_P
h = s_va * m_P / c
We define s_va as a quantity with units of m^3/s^2. m_P and s_va themselves are just unit scaling to convert consecurtive powers of 1/c to our units of measurement.
The Relationship We take this relationship, derived from the energy-wavelength equation E = hc/λ and Einstein's E=mc², as a central tenet of our theory. This formula indicates that a wavelength can be seen as fundamentally linked to the mass and the speed of light. This is not just a geometric length. Our theory states that the wavelength is therefore related to an inverse moving mass.
Momentum and Inverse Mass: We interpret h/c as a momentum per unit speed, and when related to a mass, this can be seen as the movement of a particle. This interpretation is key in defining the momentum associated with a "wavelength". We propose that the λ = h/mc relationship shows that the wavelength is the mathematical expression of the inverse of a moving mass, where 1/m is the inverse of the mass, and the h/c is the actual definition of momentum when related to a frequency.
Relating Wavelength, Distance and Frequency: We demonstrate that a wavelength can be expressed through both distance and frequency. We explore the relationship that wavelength = r / sqrt(f) where r is the distance between the two objects, and f is the frequency associated with the system, and we state that this formula also represents the wavelength of the system. We reconize that the units are not correct, but we feel that this ratio is similar and the problem with the time dimension could be fixed by looking at a span of 1 second. We explore this relationship to state that f = c^2/r^2, and through this definition, we derive a new form of the wavelength: wavelength = r^2 / c. This is another way to look at a wavelength, in terms of only distance and the speed of light.
Encoding of c: We state that the equivalence of the equations r^2 / c and ((r^2 * 1s) / frequency)^(1/2) shows that the second formula encodes c within the relationship between distance and frequency. This demonstrates that the speed of light is not just a speed, but it is fundamental to how distance and frequency interact.
Emphasis on Physical Meaning: We state that strict dimensional analysis is not the only component of understanding a theory, and that the physical insights are as important as dimensional consistency.
Gravity as a Property of Spacetime: We do not see gravity as a force acting at a distance, but as a manifestation of the relationship of lengths in the spacetime fabric that create a curve in spacetime. The distance between the masses is not merely a separation, but a physical length and curve in spacetime. Unified Framework: Our theory aims to unify gravity, quantum mechanics, and spacetime through the relationships of fundamental constants and a new understanding of wavelength. Dynamic View: We treat gravity as a dynamic process, and not a static effect. The concepts of momentum, motion, force and power, are all required to describe gravity according to our model. Rethinking Fundamental Concepts: Our framework encourages a re-evaluation of concepts such as wavelength, mass, and momentum, by linking them together in a novel way.
Looking at two plank masses separated by a light second
When you place two planck masses apart by a light second you get a force that matches the momentum of a photon with a wavelength of a light second by just taking the force over a second. This allows you to get all the properties of a photon at that momentum and frequency/wavelength.
In essence, these two weights separated by a light second give all the properties of a photon at 1Hz. We are not saying they are a photon, just that the force of the gravity equation is equal to the momentum of a photon with a wavelength of light speed and a frequency of 1 Hz.
A Wavelength-Based Approach to Gravity
F is force G is the gravitational constant m1 and m2 are the two masses r is the distance between the two masses.
s_va is the volumetric acceleration, and is related to h, G, and m_P. m_P is the Planck mass. f, f_1 and f_2 are frequencies. c is the speed of light. r is the distance. 1s is the one-second time component.
Dividing both sides by : ((s_va * m_P * f) / c^2 / 1s) / (s_va * m_P) = (s_va / m_P * (s_va * m_P * f_1) / c^3 * (s_va * m_P * f_2) / c^3 / r^2) / (s_va * m_P) Simplifying the equation: (f / c^2 / 1s) = (s_va / m_P * (s_va * m_P * f_1) / c^3 * (f_2) / c^3 / r^2) Cancelling the (f / c^2 / 1s) = (s_va * (s_va * f_1) / c^3 * (f_2) / c^3 / r^2) Multiplying both sides by : (f / c^2 / 1s) * c^2 * 1s = (s_va * (s_va * f_1) / c^3 * (f_2) / c^3 / r^2) * c^2 * 1s Simplifying the equation: f = (s_va^2 * (f_1) / c^2 * (f_2) / c^2 / r^2) * 1s Re-writing the equation: f = (s_va^2 * f_1 * f_2 / (c^4 * r^2)) * 1s Re-arranging the terms to get a wavelength: f = (s_va^2 * 1s) / (λ_1 * λ_2 * c^2 * r^2) Inverting both sides: c/f = c / ((s_va^2 * 1s) / (λ_1 * λ_2 * c^2 * r^2)) Re-arranging to obtain the wavelength: λ = (λ_1 * λ_2 * c^3 * r^2) / (s_va^2 * 1s)
Conclusion:
No comments:
Post a Comment